Iron Man Simulator vs Eat the World

Eat the World currently leads with 4,385 concurrent players against 1,032, a 4.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 1,044. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (616M vs 112.3M). Full side-by-side history for Iron Man Simulator and Eat the World is charted above.

Iron Man Simulator
1,032
playing now
1,044 24h peak · 112.3M visits
VS
Eat the World
4,385
playing now
4,969 24h peak · 616M visits

Player count history

Iron Man SimulatorEat the World

Head to head

Metric Iron Man Simulator Eat the WorldDifference
Playing now1,0324,3853,353 (4.2×)
24h peak1,0444,9693,925 (4.8×)
24h average7734,1843,411 (5.4×)
7-day peak1,0445,2404,196 (5.0×)
7-day average5163,8833,367 (7.5×)
30-day peak1,0445,2404,196 (5.0×)
All-time peak1,0445,2614,217 (5.0×)
24h change 15.2% 4.7%
7d change
Total visits112.3M616M503.7M (5.5×)
Visits (24h)134.7K402.6K267.9K (3.0×)
Visits (7d)516.9K1.9M1.4M (3.7×)
Favorites742.6K27.8M27.1M (37.4×)
Rating88.6%94.7%
Global rank (players)#1,276#370of 5,152
Trending score137.527.9
CreatedMay 8, 2018Feb 22, 2024
GenreActionSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for Iron Man Simulator, 6 for Eat the World.

Iron Man Simulator vs Eat the World — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals