Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2 vs [UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander

[UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander currently leads with 2,676 concurrent players against 1,022, a 2.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander at 7,280 concurrent players, versus 2,223. Momentum favours Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2: -4.5% week over week versus -16.2% for [UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander. Lifetime, Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2 has more visits (296.7M vs 26.7M). Full side-by-side history for Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2 and [UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander is charted above.

Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2
1,022
playing now
2,117 24h peak · 296.7M visits
VS
[UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander
2,676
playing now
5,153 24h peak · 26.7M visits

Player count history

Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2[UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander

Head to head

Metric Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2 [UPD 1.5.8] WW3 CommanderDifference
Playing now1,0222,6761,654 (2.6×)
24h peak2,1175,1533,036 (2.4×)
24h average1,3443,5752,231 (2.7×)
7-day peak2,1176,4334,316 (3.0×)
7-day average1,3444,1932,849 (3.1×)
30-day peak2,1176,7464,629 (3.2×)
All-time peak2,2237,2805,057 (3.3×)
24h change 3.2% 11.5%
7d change 4.5% 16.2%
Total visits296.7M26.7M269.9M (11.1×)
Visits (24h)227.8K406K178.2K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)1.5M3.2M1.7M (2.1×)
Favorites1.2M98.7K1.1M (12.2×)
Rating93.4%95.2%
Global rank (players)#1,246#558of 8,339
Trending score0.0-52.1
CreatedApr 3, 2024Jun 10, 2026
GenreObby & PlatformerSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Impossible Squid Game Glass Bridge 2, 14 for [UPD 1.5.8] WW3 Commander.