Eat the World vs Heavyweight Fishing

Heavyweight Fishing currently leads with 5,537 concurrent players against 4,022. On all-time peak the record belongs to Heavyweight Fishing at 5,596 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (615.5M vs 28.8M). Full side-by-side history for Eat the World and Heavyweight Fishing is charted above.

Eat the World
4,022
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.5M visits
VS
Heavyweight Fishing
5,537
playing now
5,346 24h peak · 28.8M visits

Player count history

Eat the WorldHeavyweight Fishing

Head to head

Metric Eat the World Heavyweight FishingDifference
Playing now4,0225,5371,515
24h peak4,7475,346599
24h average4,0824,300218
7-day peak5,2405,488248
7-day average3,8493,683166
30-day peak5,2405,488248
All-time peak5,2615,596335
24h change 1.0% 4.2%
7d change
Total visits615.5M28.8M586.8M (21.4×)
Visits (24h)380.8K232.9K147.8K (1.6×)
Visits (7d)1.4M919.9K506.3K (1.6×)
Favorites27.8M65.5K27.7M (424.1×)
Rating94.7%95.8%
Global rank (players)#389#305of 4,380
Trending score21.760.5
CreatedFeb 22, 2024Aug 4, 2025
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Eat the World, 5 for Heavyweight Fishing.

Eat the World vs Heavyweight Fishing — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals