Eat the World vs Catch a Brainrot

Catch a Brainrot currently leads with 4,995 concurrent players against 3,415. On all-time peak the record belongs to Catch a Brainrot at 5,548 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (615.4M vs 18.2M). Full side-by-side history for Eat the World and Catch a Brainrot is charted above.

Eat the World
3,415
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.4M visits
VS
Catch a Brainrot
4,995
playing now
5,078 24h peak · 18.2M visits

Player count history

Eat the WorldCatch a Brainrot

Head to head

Metric Eat the World Catch a BrainrotDifference
Playing now3,4154,9951,580
24h peak4,7475,078331
24h average3,9014,123222
7-day peak5,2405,548308
7-day average3,8104,085275
30-day peak5,2405,548308
All-time peak5,2615,548287
24h change 2.4% 7.0%
7d change
Total visits615.4M18.2M597.2M (33.8×)
Visits (24h)404.5K280.9K123.6K
Visits (7d)1.3M911.8K363.1K
Favorites27.8M52.4K27.7M (530.2×)
Rating94.7%89.2%
Global rank (players)#502#327of 4,279
Trending score8.53.3
CreatedFeb 22, 2024May 22, 2026
GenreSimulationRPG

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Eat the World, 4 for Catch a Brainrot.

Eat the World vs Catch a Brainrot — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals