Eat the World vs +1 Muscle to Push Boulder

Eat the World currently leads with 4,200 concurrent players against 1,998, a 2.1Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Muscle to Push Boulder at 5,538 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Lifetime, Eat the World has more visits (615.5M vs 18.9M). Full side-by-side history for Eat the World and +1 Muscle to Push Boulder is charted above.

Eat the World
4,200
playing now
4,747 24h peak Β· 615.5M visits
VS
πŸ’ͺ+1 Muscle to Push Boulder
1,998
playing now
5,427 24h peak Β· 18.9M visits

Player count history

Eat the World+1 Muscle to Push Boulder

Head to head

Metric Eat the World +1 Muscle to Push BoulderDifference
Playing now4,2001,9982,202 (2.1Γ—)
24h peak4,7475,427680
24h average4,0773,589488
7-day peak5,2405,505265
7-day average3,8463,132714
30-day peak5,2405,505265
All-time peak5,2615,538277
24h changeβ–Ό 0.6%β–² 25.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits615.5M18.9M596.6M (32.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)388.8K348.3K40.5K
Visits (7d)1.4M1M376.9K
Favorites27.8M35.2K27.8M (789.7Γ—)
Rating94.7%98.8%β€”
Global rank (players)#396#779of 4,380
Trending score21.651.5β€”
CreatedFeb 22, 2024Jun 1, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Eat the World, 5 for +1 Muscle to Push Boulder.

Eat the World vs +1 Muscle to Push Boulder β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals