Eat the World vs Brainrot Evolution

Eat the World currently leads with 3,952 concurrent players against 3,809. On all-time peak the record belongs to Eat the World at 5,261 concurrent players, versus 5,016. Lifetime, Brainrot Evolution has more visits (1.9B vs 615.6M). Full side-by-side history for Eat the World and Brainrot Evolution is charted above.

Eat the World
3,952
playing now
4,747 24h peak · 615.6M visits
VS
Brainrot Evolution
3,809
playing now
4,476 24h peak · 1.9B visits

Player count history

Eat the WorldBrainrot Evolution

Head to head

Metric Eat the World Brainrot EvolutionDifference
Playing now3,9523,809143
24h peak4,7474,476271
24h average4,0293,518511
7-day peak5,2405,016224
7-day average3,8413,306535
30-day peak5,2405,016224
All-time peak5,2615,016245
24h change 2.8% 2.0%
7d change
Total visits615.6M1.9B1.3B (3.0×)
Visits (24h)394.5K384.7K9.7K
Visits (7d)1.5M1.4M85.4K
Favorites27.8M2.5M25.3M (11.3×)
Rating94.7%96.8%
Global rank (players)#386#403of 4,425
Trending score17.522.6
CreatedFeb 22, 2024Mar 5, 2025
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Eat the World, 5 for Brainrot Evolution.

Eat the World vs Brainrot Evolution — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals