Track & Field: Infinite vs 100 Waves Later

Track & Field: Infinite currently leads with 803 concurrent players against 487, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Track & Field: Infinite at 857 concurrent players, versus 803. Lifetime, Track & Field: Infinite has more visits (177.6M vs 58M). Full side-by-side history for Track & Field: Infinite and 100 Waves Later is charted above.

Track & Field: Infinite
803
playing now
857 24h peak · 177.6M visits
VS
100 Waves Later
487
playing now
803 24h peak · 58M visits

Player count history

Track & Field: Infinite100 Waves Later

Head to head

Metric Track & Field: Infinite 100 Waves LaterDifference
Playing now803487316 (1.6×)
24h peak85780354
24h average56052337
7-day peak85780354
7-day average44050565
30-day peak85780354
All-time peak85780354
24h change 64.7% 0.9%
7d change
Total visits177.6M58M119.6M (3.1×)
Visits (24h)69.6K57K12.6K
Visits (7d)153.5K193.3K39.8K
Favorites254.2K251.8K2.4K
Rating83.6%98.3%
Global rank (players)#1,448#1,806of 4,380
Trending score71.19.3
CreatedFeb 18, 2024Nov 14, 2025
GenreSports & RacingSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Track & Field: Infinite, 5 for 100 Waves Later.

Track & Field: Infinite vs 100 Waves Later — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals