Track & Field: Infinite vs Lucky World! (EMERALD LUCKY BLOCKS!)

Lucky World! (EMERALD LUCKY BLOCKS!) currently leads with 622 concurrent players against 477. On all-time peak the record belongs to Track & Field: Infinite at 896 concurrent players, versus 883. Lifetime, Track & Field: Infinite has more visits (178.2M vs 17.2M). Full side-by-side history for Track & Field: Infinite and Lucky World! (EMERALD LUCKY BLOCKS!) is charted above.

Track & Field: Infinite
477
playing now
669 24h peak · 178.2M visits
VS
⛏️Lucky World! 💚 (EMERALD LUCKY BLOCKS!)
622
playing now
879 24h peak · 17.2M visits

Player count history

Track & Field: InfiniteLucky World! (EMERALD LUCKY BLOCKS!)

Head to head

Metric Track & Field: Infinite Lucky World! (EMERALD LUCKY BLOCKS!)Difference
Playing now477622145
24h peak669879210
24h average450667217
7-day peak85787922
7-day average447576129
30-day peak85787922
All-time peak89688313
24h change 13.9% 16.2%
7d change 4.4%
Total visits178.2M17.2M161M (10.4×)
Visits (24h)72.4K99.4K27K
Visits (7d)509.1K609.8K100.8K
Favorites254.8K9.6K245.2K (26.6×)
Rating83.6%75.2%
Global rank (players)#2,358#2,030of 7,787
Trending score1.742.9
CreatedFeb 18, 2024Jul 4, 2025
GenreSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for Track & Field: Infinite, 7 for Lucky World! (EMERALD LUCKY BLOCKS!).