Track & Field: Infinite vs [QOL + BALANCE CHANGES] LOCKED:2

Track & Field: Infinite currently leads with 833 concurrent players against 483, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Track & Field: Infinite at 857 concurrent players, versus 670. Lifetime, Track & Field: Infinite has more visits (177.6M vs 31.4M). Full side-by-side history for Track & Field: Infinite and [QOL + BALANCE CHANGES] LOCKED:2 is charted above.

Track & Field: Infinite
833
playing now
857 24h peak · 177.6M visits
VS
[QOL + BALANCE CHANGES] LOCKED:2
483
playing now
670 24h peak · 31.4M visits

Player count history

Track & Field: Infinite[QOL + BALANCE CHANGES] LOCKED:2

Head to head

Metric Track & Field: Infinite [QOL + BALANCE CHANGES] LOCKED:2Difference
Playing now833483350 (1.7×)
24h peak857670187
24h average55749067
7-day peak857670187
7-day average43947637
30-day peak857670187
All-time peak857670187
24h change 63.8% 42.9%
7d change
Total visits177.6M31.4M146.2M (5.7×)
Visits (24h)68.7K28.7K39.9K (2.4×)
Visits (7d)152.6K40.4K112.2K (3.8×)
Favorites254.2K54.5K199.7K (4.7×)
Rating83.6%97.7%
Global rank (players)#1,433#1,812of 4,380
Trending score70.07.5
CreatedFeb 18, 2024Apr 26, 2025
GenreSports & RacingSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Track & Field: Infinite, 3 for [QOL + BALANCE CHANGES] LOCKED:2.

Track & Field: Infinite vs [QOL + BALANCE CHANGES] LOCKED:2 — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals