BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator vs [STUN] Classic Tower Defense
BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator currently leads with 263 concurrent players against 79, a 3.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator at 538 concurrent players, versus 477. Momentum favours [STUN] Classic Tower Defense: +140.0% week over week versus +10.0% for BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator. Lifetime, BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator has more visits (179M vs 2.7M). Full side-by-side history for BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator and [STUN] Classic Tower Defense is charted above.
BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator
263
playing now
345 24h peak · 179M visits
VS
[⚡STUN] Classic Tower Defense
79
playing now
477 24h peak · 2.7M visits
Player count history
BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator[STUN] Classic Tower Defense
Head to head
| Metric | BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator | [STUN] Classic Tower Defense | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 263 | 79 | 184 (3.3×) |
| 24h peak | 345 | 477 | 132 |
| 24h average | 266 | 92 | 174 (2.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 489 | 477 | 12 |
| 7-day average | 297 | 60 | 237 (5.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 489 | 477 | 12 |
| All-time peak | 538 | 477 | 61 |
| 24h change | ▼ 3.6% | ▲ 58.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 10.0% | ▲ 140.0% | — |
| Total visits | 179M | 2.7M | 176.3M (65.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 82.6K | 19.8K | 62.8K (4.2×) |
| Visits (7d) | 690.7K | 88.7K | 602K (7.8×) |
| Favorites | 811.6K | 74.2K | 737.4K (10.9×) |
| Rating | 84.2% | 86.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,606 | #3,754 | of 7,215 |
| Trending score | -23.5 | 75.6 | — |
| Created | Feb 17, 2024 | Feb 5, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for BODYCAM: SWAT Simulator, 11 for [STUN] Classic Tower Defense.