Piggy: Classic vs Build to Defend Loot
Build to Defend Loot currently leads with 2,170 concurrent players against 448, a 4.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Defend Loot at 3,107 concurrent players, versus 2,826. Momentum favours Piggy: Classic: +20.2% week over week versus +14.3% for Build to Defend Loot. Lifetime, Build to Defend Loot has more visits (111.6M vs 70.4M). Full side-by-side history for Piggy: Classic and Build to Defend Loot is charted above.
Piggy: Classic
448
playing now
1,931 24h peak · 70.4M visits
VS
⚔️Build to Defend Loot
2,170
playing now
2,574 24h peak · 111.6M visits
Player count history
Piggy: ClassicBuild to Defend Loot
Head to head
| Metric | Piggy: Classic | Build to Defend Loot | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 448 | 2,170 | 1,722 (4.8×) |
| 24h peak | 1,931 | 2,574 | 643 |
| 24h average | 1,035 | 1,942 | 907 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,809 | 2,978 | 169 |
| 7-day average | 1,379 | 2,114 | 735 (1.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,809 | 2,978 | 169 |
| All-time peak | 2,826 | 3,107 | 281 |
| 24h change | ▼ 15.2% | ▲ 6.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 20.2% | ▲ 14.3% | — |
| Total visits | 70.4M | 111.6M | 41.1M (1.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 195.1K | 253.5K | 58.4K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 2M | 427.6K |
| Favorites | 70K | 96.9K | 26.9K |
| Rating | 86.1% | 87.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,827 | #587 | of 7,328 |
| Trending score | -74.0 | -26.5 | — |
| Created | Feb 15, 2024 | Jan 3, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Survival | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Piggy: Classic, 10 for Build to Defend Loot.