The Eternal Abyss vs [TESTING] War of the Worlds

[TESTING] War of the Worlds currently leads with 688 concurrent players against 422, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [TESTING] War of the Worlds at 776 concurrent players, versus 606. Lifetime, [TESTING] War of the Worlds has more visits (42.2M vs 6.6M). Full side-by-side history for The Eternal Abyss and [TESTING] War of the Worlds is charted above.

The Eternal Abyss
422
playing now
606 24h peak · 6.6M visits
VS
[TESTING] War of the Worlds
688
playing now
776 24h peak · 42.2M visits

Player count history

The Eternal Abyss[TESTING] War of the Worlds

Head to head

Metric The Eternal Abyss [TESTING] War of the WorldsDifference
Playing now422688266 (1.6×)
24h peak606776170
24h average428636208
7-day peak606776170
7-day average388629241 (1.6×)
30-day peak606776170
All-time peak606776170
24h change 7.8% 3.2%
7d change
Total visits6.6M42.2M35.7M (6.4×)
Visits (24h)23.2K82.1K58.9K (3.5×)
Visits (7d)96.4K145.6K49.2K (1.5×)
Favorites19.2K316.3K297.1K (16.5×)
Rating85.6%86.0%
Global rank (players)#2,039#1,645of 5,050
Trending score25.63.0
CreatedJan 4, 2024Oct 25, 2024
GenreObby & PlatformerAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for The Eternal Abyss, 3 for [TESTING] War of the Worlds.

The Eternal Abyss vs [TESTING] War of the Worlds — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals