The Eternal Abyss vs Track & Field: Infinite

Track & Field: Infinite currently leads with 632 concurrent players against 415, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Track & Field: Infinite at 632 concurrent players, versus 537. Lifetime, Track & Field: Infinite has more visits (177.6M vs 6.5M). Full side-by-side history for The Eternal Abyss and Track & Field: Infinite is charted above.

The Eternal Abyss
415
playing now
537 24h peak · 6.5M visits
VS
Track & Field: Infinite
632
playing now
632 24h peak · 177.6M visits

Player count history

The Eternal AbyssTrack & Field: Infinite

Head to head

Metric The Eternal Abyss Track & Field: InfiniteDifference
Playing now415632217 (1.5×)
24h peak53763295
24h average39846971
7-day peak53763295
7-day average38141231
30-day peak53763295
All-time peak53763295
24h change 21.7% 25.1%
7d change
Total visits6.5M177.6M171M (27.2×)
Visits (24h)20.7K64.7K44K (3.1×)
Visits (7d)70.4K138.1K67.7K (2.0×)
Favorites19.2K254.2K235K (13.2×)
Rating85.6%83.6%
Global rank (players)#1,932#1,601of 4,381
Trending score10.935.0
CreatedJan 4, 2024Feb 18, 2024
GenreObby & PlatformerSports & Racing

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for The Eternal Abyss, 4 for Track & Field: Infinite.

The Eternal Abyss vs Track & Field: Infinite — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals