[CBM] HUB vs FTF_Practice

FTF_Practice currently leads with 48 concurrent players against 0, a 48.0Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FTF_Practice at 361 concurrent players, versus 355. Lifetime, FTF_Practice has more visits (4.7M vs 3.1M). Full side-by-side history for [CBM] HUB and FTF_Practice is charted above.

[CBM] HUB
0
playing now
186 24h peak Β· 3.1M visits
VS
[🌺] FTF_Practice
48
playing now
286 24h peak Β· 4.7M visits

Player count history

[CBM] HUBFTF_Practice

Head to head

Metric [CBM] HUB FTF_PracticeDifference
Playing now04848
24h peak186286100 (1.5Γ—)
24h average5611963 (2.1Γ—)
7-day peak28234664
7-day average7615074 (2.0Γ—)
30-day peak28234664
All-time peak3553616
24h changeβ–Ό 21.1%β–Ό 6.3%β€”
7d changeβ–Ό 15.6%β€”β€”
Total visits3.1M4.7M1.6M (1.5Γ—)
Visits (24h)4.6K19.3K14.7K (4.2Γ—)
Visits (7d)42.3K124.4K82.1K (2.9Γ—)
Favorites1.7K11.3K9.6K (6.5Γ—)
Rating91.7%84.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#6,419#3,807of 7,328
Trending score-36.0-37.4β€”
CreatedDec 27, 2023Dec 7, 2024β€”
GenreSports & Racingβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 11 days for [CBM] HUB, 7 for FTF_Practice.

[CBM] HUB vs FTF_Practice β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals