Ball Eating Simulator vs [STUN] Classic Tower Defense
Ball Eating Simulator currently leads with 216 concurrent players against 86, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [STUN] Classic Tower Defense at 477 concurrent players, versus 468. Momentum favours [STUN] Classic Tower Defense: +126.9% week over week versus +20.2% for Ball Eating Simulator. Lifetime, Ball Eating Simulator has more visits (116.4M vs 2.7M). Full side-by-side history for Ball Eating Simulator and [STUN] Classic Tower Defense is charted above.
Ball Eating Simulator
216
playing now
388 24h peak · 116.4M visits
VS
[⚡STUN] Classic Tower Defense
86
playing now
477 24h peak · 2.7M visits
Player count history
Ball Eating Simulator[STUN] Classic Tower Defense
Head to head
| Metric | Ball Eating Simulator | [STUN] Classic Tower Defense | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 216 | 86 | 130 (2.5×) |
| 24h peak | 388 | 477 | 89 |
| 24h average | 246 | 91 | 155 (2.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 468 | 477 | 9 |
| 7-day average | 292 | 59 | 233 (4.9×) |
| 30-day peak | 468 | 477 | 9 |
| All-time peak | 468 | 477 | 9 |
| 24h change | ▼ 6.8% | ▲ 56.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 20.2% | ▲ 126.9% | — |
| Total visits | 116.4M | 2.7M | 113.6M (42.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 43.4K | 18.3K | 25.1K (2.4×) |
| Visits (7d) | 374K | 86.2K | 287.8K (4.3×) |
| Favorites | 6.8M | 74.1K | 6.7M (91.3×) |
| Rating | 91.8% | 86.6% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,743 | #3,548 | of 7,126 |
| Trending score | -35.0 | 76.4 | — |
| Created | Nov 14, 2023 | Feb 5, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Strategy | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Ball Eating Simulator, 10 for [STUN] Classic Tower Defense.