Ball Eating Simulator vs The Eternal Abyss

The Eternal Abyss currently leads with 478 concurrent players against 279, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to The Eternal Abyss at 533 concurrent players, versus 403. Lifetime, Ball Eating Simulator has more visits (116.1M vs 6.5M). Full side-by-side history for Ball Eating Simulator and The Eternal Abyss is charted above.

Ball Eating Simulator
279
playing now
403 24h peak · 116.1M visits
VS
The Eternal Abyss
478
playing now
518 24h peak · 6.5M visits

Player count history

Ball Eating SimulatorThe Eternal Abyss

Head to head

Metric Ball Eating Simulator The Eternal AbyssDifference
Playing now279478199 (1.7×)
24h peak403518115
24h average308417109
7-day peak403533130
7-day average257384127
30-day peak403533130
All-time peak403533130
24h change 26.2% 22.6%
7d change
Total visits116.1M6.5M109.5M (17.8×)
Visits (24h)52.3K20.1K32.2K (2.6×)
Visits (7d)152.6K66.1K86.4K (2.3×)
Favorites6.7M19.1K6.7M (352.8×)
Rating91.8%85.6%
Global rank (players)#2,198#1,785of 4,279
Trending score45.321.2
CreatedNov 14, 2023Jan 4, 2024
GenreSimulationObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Ball Eating Simulator, 4 for The Eternal Abyss.

Ball Eating Simulator vs The Eternal Abyss — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals