[UPD!] Soccer Training vs Jump To Steal Slime

Jump To Steal Slime currently leads with 3,361 concurrent players against 750, a 4.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Jump To Steal Slime at 3,423 concurrent players, versus 2,130. Lifetime, Jump To Steal Slime has more visits (15.3M vs 9.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD!] Soccer Training and Jump To Steal Slime is charted above.

[UPD!] Soccer Training⚽πŸ’₯
750
playing now
1,039 24h peak Β· 9.8M visits
VS
Jump To Steal Slime 🟒
3,361
playing now
3,423 24h peak Β· 15.3M visits

Player count history

[UPD!] Soccer TrainingJump To Steal Slime

Head to head

Metric [UPD!] Soccer Training Jump To Steal SlimeDifference
Playing now7503,3612,611 (4.5Γ—)
24h peak1,0393,4232,384 (3.3Γ—)
24h average8122,7131,901 (3.3Γ—)
7-day peak2,1303,4231,293 (1.6Γ—)
7-day average1,2562,6881,432 (2.1Γ—)
30-day peak2,1303,4231,293 (1.6Γ—)
All-time peak2,1303,4231,293 (1.6Γ—)
24h changeβ–Ό 18.7%β–² 8.6%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits9.8M15.3M5.5M (1.6Γ—)
Visits (24h)62.6K237.3K174.8K (3.8Γ—)
Visits (7d)206.4K591.8K385.3K (2.9Γ—)
Favorites17.3K744.7K727.4K (43.0Γ—)
Rating96.7%83.4%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,443#470of 4,278
Trending score-101.03.2β€”
CreatedNov 9, 2023Jun 6, 2026β€”
GenreSimulationSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 3 days for [UPD!] Soccer Training, 3 for Jump To Steal Slime.

[UPD!] Soccer Training vs Jump To Steal Slime β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals