[UPD!] Soccer Training vs [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem
[ WORKERS] Cut a Gem currently leads with 1,309 concurrent players against 745, a 1.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem at 2,191 concurrent players, versus 2,130. Lifetime, [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem has more visits (9.8M vs 9.8M). Full side-by-side history for [UPD!] Soccer Training and [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem is charted above.
[UPD!] Soccer Training⚽💥
745
playing now
1,039 24h peak · 9.8M visits
VS
[👷 WORKERS] Cut a Gem
1,309
playing now
1,961 24h peak · 9.8M visits
Player count history
[UPD!] Soccer Training[ WORKERS] Cut a Gem
Head to head
| Metric | [UPD!] Soccer Training | [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 745 | 1,309 | 564 (1.8×) |
| 24h peak | 1,039 | 1,961 | 922 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 812 | 1,347 | 535 (1.7×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,130 | 2,191 | 61 |
| 7-day average | 1,256 | 1,491 | 235 |
| 30-day peak | 2,130 | 2,191 | 61 |
| All-time peak | 2,130 | 2,191 | 61 |
| 24h change | ▼ 18.7% | ▼ 7.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 9.8M | 9.8M | 25.9K |
| Visits (24h) | 62.6K | 125.6K | 63.1K (2.0×) |
| Visits (7d) | 206.4K | 471.1K | 264.6K (2.3×) |
| Favorites | 17.3K | 338K | 320.7K (19.5×) |
| Rating | 96.7% | 97.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,443 | #1,068 | of 4,278 |
| Trending score | -101.0 | -29.8 | — |
| Created | Nov 9, 2023 | May 23, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 3 days for [UPD!] Soccer Training, 4 for [ WORKERS] Cut a Gem.