Lexington & Concord vs [UPD]Football Legends
[UPD]Football Legends currently leads with 1,849 concurrent players against 1,090, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD]Football Legends at 2,161 concurrent players, versus 1,407. Lifetime, [UPD]Football Legends has more visits (127.2M vs 38.1M). Full side-by-side history for Lexington & Concord and [UPD]Football Legends is charted above.
Lexington & Concord
1,090
playing now
1,407 24h peak · 38.1M visits
VS
[UPD]🏈Football Legends🏈
1,849
playing now
2,161 24h peak · 127.2M visits
Player count history
Lexington & Concord[UPD]Football Legends
Head to head
| Metric | Lexington & Concord | [UPD]Football Legends | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,090 | 1,849 | 759 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 1,407 | 2,161 | 754 (1.5×) |
| 24h average | 1,039 | 1,452 | 413 |
| 7-day peak | 1,407 | 2,161 | 754 (1.5×) |
| 7-day average | 966 | 1,235 | 269 |
| 30-day peak | 1,407 | 2,161 | 754 (1.5×) |
| All-time peak | 1,407 | 2,161 | 754 (1.5×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 7.4% | ▲ 112.9% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 38.1M | 127.2M | 89.2M (3.3×) |
| Visits (24h) | 84.4K | 70.5K | 13.9K |
| Visits (7d) | 188.5K | 248.3K | 59.8K |
| Favorites | 173.8K | 89.8K | 84K (1.9×) |
| Rating | 86.7% | 86.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,214 | #832 | of 4,380 |
| Trending score | 22.3 | 54.5 | — |
| Created | Nov 5, 2023 | Sep 2, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Lexington & Concord, 5 for [UPD]Football Legends.