A Simple Obby? vs [UPD] Derelict

A Simple Obby? currently leads with 3,761 concurrent players against 755, a 5.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to A Simple Obby? at 4,087 concurrent players, versus 872. Lifetime, A Simple Obby? has more visits (149.7M vs 25.9M). Full side-by-side history for A Simple Obby? and [UPD] Derelict is charted above.

A Simple Obby?
3,761
playing now
3,798 24h peak · 149.7M visits
VS
[UPD] Derelict
755
playing now
834 24h peak · 25.9M visits

Player count history

A Simple Obby?[UPD] Derelict

Head to head

Metric A Simple Obby? [UPD] DerelictDifference
Playing now3,7617553,006 (5.0×)
24h peak3,7988342,964 (4.6×)
24h average2,5997191,880 (3.6×)
7-day peak4,0878523,235 (4.8×)
7-day average1,559703856 (2.2×)
30-day peak4,0878523,235 (4.8×)
All-time peak4,0878723,215 (4.7×)
24h change 56.6% 5.9%
7d change
Total visits149.7M25.9M123.9M (5.8×)
Visits (24h)160.7K34.7K126K (4.6×)
Visits (7d)471K68.7K402.3K (6.9×)
Favorites204.8K491.2K286.3K (2.4×)
Rating50.1%90.2%
Global rank (players)#509#1,579of 4,743
Trending score224.36.3
CreatedMar 18, 2018May 29, 2022
GenreObby & PlatformerRPG

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for A Simple Obby?, 3 for [UPD] Derelict.

A Simple Obby? vs [UPD] Derelict — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals