A Simple Obby? vs Find the Chameleons [280]

Find the Chameleons [280] currently leads with 3,134 concurrent players against 1,341, a 2.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to A Simple Obby? at 4,087 concurrent players, versus 3,341. Lifetime, A Simple Obby? has more visits (149.6M vs 6.5M). Full side-by-side history for A Simple Obby? and Find the Chameleons [280] is charted above.

A Simple Obby?
1,341
playing now
2,128 24h peak · 149.6M visits
VS
Find the Chameleons [280]
3,134
playing now
3,148 24h peak · 6.5M visits

Player count history

A Simple Obby?Find the Chameleons [280]

Head to head

Metric A Simple Obby? Find the Chameleons [280]Difference
Playing now1,3413,1341,793 (2.3×)
24h peak2,1283,1481,020
24h average1,2162,4201,204 (2.0×)
7-day peak4,0873,275812
7-day average1,3221,628306
30-day peak4,0873,275812
All-time peak4,0873,341746
24h change 0.0% 46.8%
7d change
Total visits149.6M6.5M143.1M (23.1×)
Visits (24h)85.7K272.9K187.2K (3.2×)
Visits (7d)339.1K604.2K265.1K (1.8×)
Favorites201.8K578.3K376.5K (2.9×)
Rating50.1%94.0%
Global rank (players)#1,079#543of 4,380
Trending score-24.3162.2
CreatedMar 18, 2018Jul 16, 2026
GenreObby & PlatformerAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for A Simple Obby?, 4 for Find the Chameleons [280].

A Simple Obby? vs Find the Chameleons [280] — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals