A Simple Obby? vs Build to Survive
Build to Survive currently leads with 6,056 concurrent players against 1,525, a 4.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 5,725. Momentum favours A Simple Obby?: +57.3% week over week versus -3.0% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Build to Survive has more visits (409.2M vs 151.4M). Full side-by-side history for A Simple Obby? and Build to Survive is charted above.
A Simple Obby?
1,525
playing now
5,725 24h peak · 151.4M visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
6,056
playing now
7,252 24h peak · 409.2M visits
Player count history
A Simple Obby?Build to Survive
Head to head
| Metric | A Simple Obby? | Build to Survive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,525 | 6,056 | 4,531 (4.0×) |
| 24h peak | 5,725 | 7,252 | 1,527 |
| 24h average | 3,041 | 5,676 | 2,635 (1.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 5,725 | 7,252 | 1,527 |
| 7-day average | 2,356 | 5,104 | 2,748 (2.2×) |
| 30-day peak | 5,725 | 7,252 | 1,527 |
| All-time peak | 5,725 | 7,252 | 1,527 |
| 24h change | ▲ 28.2% | ▲ 3.8% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 57.3% | ▼ 3.0% | — |
| Total visits | 151.4M | 409.2M | 257.8M (2.7×) |
| Visits (24h) | 371.9K | 505K | 133.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 3.5M | 1.9M (2.2×) |
| Favorites | 233.5K | 10.9M | 10.7M (46.8×) |
| Rating | 49.8% | 96.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #981 | #268 | of 8,019 |
| Trending score | 100.3 | 41.9 | — |
| Created | Mar 18, 2018 | Feb 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for A Simple Obby?, 12 for Build to Survive.