A Simple Obby? vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
FNAF: Eternal Nights currently leads with 4,813 concurrent players against 2,240, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FNAF: Eternal Nights at 7,002 concurrent players, versus 5,725. Momentum favours A Simple Obby?: +65.3% week over week versus -9.4% for FNAF: Eternal Nights. Lifetime, FNAF: Eternal Nights has more visits (317.8M vs 151.4M). Full side-by-side history for A Simple Obby? and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
A Simple Obby?
2,240
playing now
5,725 24h peak · 151.4M visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
4,813
playing now
5,550 24h peak · 317.8M visits
Player count history
A Simple Obby?FNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | A Simple Obby? | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,240 | 4,813 | 2,573 (2.1×) |
| 24h peak | 5,725 | 5,550 | 175 |
| 24h average | 3,912 | 4,412 | 500 |
| 7-day peak | 5,725 | 6,885 | 1,160 |
| 7-day average | 2,473 | 3,934 | 1,461 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 5,725 | 6,885 | 1,160 |
| All-time peak | 5,725 | 7,002 | 1,277 |
| 24h change | ▲ 109.8% | ▲ 21.2% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 65.3% | ▼ 9.4% | — |
| Total visits | 151.4M | 317.8M | 166.4M (2.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 409.5K | 528K | 118.5K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 3.8M | 2.3M (2.4×) |
| Favorites | 233.2K | 848.5K | 615.3K (3.6×) |
| Rating | 49.8% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #805 | #389 | of 7,928 |
| Trending score | 207.0 | 44.0 | — |
| Created | Mar 18, 2018 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Obby & Platformer | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for A Simple Obby?, 13 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.