Flex UGC Codes vs Viral Emotes Testing

Viral Emotes Testing currently leads with 2,169 concurrent players against 783, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Viral Emotes Testing at 2,262 concurrent players, versus 2,232. Lifetime, Flex UGC Codes has more visits (136.2M vs 1.8M). Full side-by-side history for Flex UGC Codes and Viral Emotes Testing is charted above.

Flex UGC Codes
783
playing now
1,894 24h peak · 136.2M visits
VS
Viral Emotes Testing
2,169
playing now
2,262 24h peak · 1.8M visits

Player count history

Flex UGC CodesViral Emotes Testing

Head to head

Metric Flex UGC Codes Viral Emotes TestingDifference
Playing now7832,1691,386 (2.8×)
24h peak1,8942,262368
24h average7551,8421,087 (2.4×)
7-day peak2,2322,26230
7-day average7171,7811,064 (2.5×)
30-day peak2,2322,26230
All-time peak2,2322,26230
24h change 5.6% 14.3%
7d change
Total visits136.2M1.8M134.4M (74.8×)
Visits (24h)294.6K236.3K58.2K
Visits (7d)1.4M365.1K1.1M (4.0×)
Favorites1.7M5.1K1.7M (343.3×)
Rating84.5%74.0%
Global rank (players)#1,737#908of 5,405
Trending score14.811.0
CreatedOct 19, 2023Jul 1, 2026
GenreUtility & OtherSocial

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for Flex UGC Codes, 2 for Viral Emotes Testing.

Flex UGC Codes vs Viral Emotes Testing — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals