[SKINS] Bike of Hell vs Meta’s Glitch Obby

[SKINS] Bike of Hell currently leads with 913 concurrent players against 460, a 2.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Meta’s Glitch Obby at 1,154 concurrent players, versus 1,132. Lifetime, [SKINS] Bike of Hell has more visits (622.9M vs 19.9M). Full side-by-side history for [SKINS] Bike of Hell and Meta’s Glitch Obby is charted above.

[SKINS] Bike of Hell
913
playing now
1,045 24h peak · 622.9M visits
VS
👾 Meta’s Glitch Obby
460
playing now
709 24h peak · 19.9M visits

Player count history

[SKINS] Bike of HellMeta’s Glitch Obby

Head to head

Metric [SKINS] Bike of Hell Meta’s Glitch ObbyDifference
Playing now913460453 (2.0×)
24h peak1,045709336
24h average900470430 (1.9×)
7-day peak1,0921,15462
7-day average782678104
30-day peak1,0921,15462
All-time peak1,1321,15422
24h change 31.4% 27.0%
7d change
Total visits622.9M19.9M603M (31.3×)
Visits (24h)143.2K68.8K74.5K (2.1×)
Visits (7d)260.9K314.3K53.4K
Favorites2.1M1.3M862.3K (1.7×)
Rating71.7%67.5%
Global rank (players)#1,321#1,801of 4,278
Trending score43.3-79.3
CreatedOct 1, 2023Dec 25, 2023
GenreObby & PlatformerObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 2 days for [SKINS] Bike of Hell, 4 for Meta’s Glitch Obby.

[SKINS] Bike of Hell vs Meta’s Glitch Obby — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals