Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog] vs [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

[UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] currently leads with 881 concurrent players against 344, a 2.6Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] at 994 concurrent players, versus 592. Lifetime, Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog] has more visits (132.8M vs 1M). Full side-by-side history for Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog] and [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.

Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog]
344
playing now
592 24h peak Β· 132.8M visits
VS
[πŸ”₯UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
881
playing now
994 24h peak Β· 1M visits

Player count history

Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog][UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Head to head

Metric Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog] [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]Difference
Playing now344881537 (2.6Γ—)
24h peak592994402 (1.7Γ—)
24h average426648222 (1.5Γ—)
7-day peak592994402 (1.7Γ—)
7-day average43648448
30-day peak592994402 (1.7Γ—)
All-time peak592994402 (1.7Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 5.2%β–² 41.5%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits132.8M1M131.7M (129.0Γ—)
Visits (24h)46.3K128.1K81.8K (2.8Γ—)
Visits (7d)165.1K308.6K143.6K (1.9Γ—)
Favorites6.1M5.4K6.1M (1119.0Γ—)
Rating79.2%86.6%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,964#1,309of 4,380
Trending score-5.790.8β€”
CreatedOct 1, 2023Jul 29, 2026β€”
GenreShoppingStrategyβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog], 4 for [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].

Lucky Avatars! [Outfits Catalog] vs [UPD] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals