ABA vs [Now] Catch a Monster

ABA currently leads with 7,085 concurrent players against 6,697. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Now] Catch a Monster at 30,412 concurrent players, versus 7,420. Momentum favours ABA: +0.0% week over week versus -6.7% for [Now] Catch a Monster. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 437.5M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and [Now] Catch a Monster is charted above.

ABA
7,085
playing now
7,225 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
[Now] Catch a Monster
6,697
playing now
8,271 24h peak · 437.5M visits

Player count history

ABA[Now] Catch a Monster

Head to head

Metric ABA [Now] Catch a MonsterDifference
Playing now7,0856,697388
24h peak7,2258,2711,046
24h average6,1926,969777
7-day peak7,33816,7439,405 (2.3×)
7-day average5,4528,1522,700
30-day peak7,33816,7439,405 (2.3×)
All-time peak7,42030,41222,992 (4.1×)
24h change 16.0% 13.5%
7d change 0.0% 6.7%
Total visits1.3B437.5M872.1M (3.0×)
Visits (24h)493K684.6K191.6K
Visits (7d)3.4M5.7M2.3M (1.7×)
Favorites1M593.8K407.1K (1.7×)
Rating80.8%97.9%
Global rank (players)#234#242of 7,866
Trending score51.2-55.6
CreatedFeb 25, 2018Nov 10, 2025
GenreActionAdventure

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for ABA, 12 for [Now] Catch a Monster.