ABA vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

ABA currently leads with 7,001 concurrent players against 3,832, a 1.8Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to ABA at 7,001 concurrent players, versus 4,443. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 18.6M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower is charted above.

ABA
7,001
playing now
7,001 24h peak Β· 1.3B visits
VS
Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower πŸ’ƒ
3,832
playing now
4,029 24h peak Β· 18.6M visits

Player count history

ABAWould You Rather: Emote Testing Tower

Head to head

Metric ABA Would You Rather: Emote Testing TowerDifference
Playing now7,0013,8323,169 (1.8Γ—)
24h peak7,0014,0292,972 (1.7Γ—)
24h average5,6073,1142,493 (1.8Γ—)
7-day peak7,0014,4432,558 (1.6Γ—)
7-day average5,5112,7172,794 (2.0Γ—)
30-day peak7,0014,4432,558 (1.6Γ—)
All-time peak7,0014,4432,558 (1.6Γ—)
24h changeβ–² 14.7%β–² 60.4%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.3B18.6M1.3B (70.3Γ—)
Visits (24h)429.2K423.6K5.6K
Visits (7d)1.5M1.5M73.1K
Favorites1M1.8M763.4K (1.8Γ—)
Rating80.8%84.9%β€”
Global rank (players)#239#453of 4,381
Trending score6.550.6β€”
CreatedFeb 25, 2018Apr 13, 2026β€”
GenreActionObby & Platformerβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for ABA, 5 for Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower.

ABA vs Would You Rather: Emote Testing Tower β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals