ABA vs [X2] Freeze for UGC

ABA currently leads with 6,810 concurrent players against 2,535, a 2.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to ABA at 6,810 concurrent players, versus 6,305. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 21M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and [X2] Freeze for UGC is charted above.

ABA
6,810
playing now
6,749 24h peak Β· 1.3B visits
VS
[X2] Freeze for UGC 🧊
2,535
playing now
3,841 24h peak Β· 21M visits

Player count history

ABA[X2] Freeze for UGC

Head to head

Metric ABA [X2] Freeze for UGCDifference
Playing now6,8102,5354,275 (2.7Γ—)
24h peak6,7493,8412,908 (1.8Γ—)
24h average5,4783,1182,360 (1.8Γ—)
7-day peak6,7756,138637
7-day average5,4882,7812,707 (2.0Γ—)
30-day peak6,7756,138637
All-time peak6,8106,305505
24h changeβ–² 12.1%β–² 8.3%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.3B21M1.3B (62.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)405.3K480.1K74.8K
Visits (7d)1.5M1.5M6.9K
Favorites1M218.9K781.2K (4.6Γ—)
Rating80.8%79.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#238#660of 4,381
Trending score-0.742.0β€”
CreatedFeb 25, 2018Jun 21, 2024β€”
GenreActionObby & Platformerβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for ABA, 5 for [X2] Freeze for UGC.

ABA vs [X2] Freeze for UGC β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals