ABA vs Eat the World
ABA currently leads with 3,906 concurrent players against 3,212. On all-time peak the record belongs to ABA at 7,634 concurrent players, versus 5,261. Momentum favours ABA: -4.0% week over week versus -14.0% for Eat the World. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 618.4M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and Eat the World is charted above.
ABA
3,906
playing now
7,634 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
Eat the World
3,212
playing now
4,011 24h peak · 618.4M visits
Player count history
ABAEat the World
Head to head
| Metric | ABA | Eat the World | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 3,906 | 3,212 | 694 |
| 24h peak | 7,634 | 4,011 | 3,623 (1.9×) |
| 24h average | 5,392 | 3,308 | 2,084 (1.6×) |
| 7-day peak | 7,634 | 4,953 | 2,681 (1.5×) |
| 7-day average | 5,256 | 3,317 | 1,939 (1.6×) |
| 30-day peak | 7,634 | 4,953 | 2,681 (1.5×) |
| All-time peak | 7,634 | 5,261 | 2,373 |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.0% | ▲ 8.9% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 4.0% | ▼ 14.0% | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 618.4M | 691.5M (2.1×) |
| Visits (24h) | 525.6K | 316.4K | 209.2K (1.7×) |
| Visits (7d) | 3.4M | 2.3M | 1.1M |
| Favorites | 1M | 27.9M | 26.9M (27.8×) |
| Rating | 80.8% | 94.7% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #427 | #529 | of 8,016 |
| Trending score | 9.6 | -0.9 | — |
| Created | Feb 25, 2018 | Feb 22, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Action | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for ABA, 13 for Eat the World.