ABA vs +1 Fat Per Click

ABA currently leads with 7,087 concurrent players against 2,845, a 2.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Fat Per Click at 8,085 concurrent players, versus 7,118. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 19.9M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and +1 Fat Per Click is charted above.

ABA
7,087
playing now
7,118 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
+1 Fat Per Click
2,845
playing now
4,141 24h peak · 19.9M visits

Player count history

ABA+1 Fat Per Click

Head to head

Metric ABA +1 Fat Per ClickDifference
Playing now7,0872,8454,242 (2.5×)
24h peak7,1184,1412,977 (1.7×)
24h average5,7103,1722,538 (1.8×)
7-day peak7,1187,961843
7-day average5,5334,1511,382
30-day peak7,1187,961843
All-time peak7,1188,085967
24h change 20.6% 21.2%
7d change
Total visits1.3B19.9M1.3B (65.6×)
Visits (24h)429.4K292.6K136.8K
Visits (7d)1.6M1.2M377.3K
Favorites1M25.2K974.9K (39.6×)
Rating80.8%94.4%
Global rank (players)#233#618of 4,380
Trending score12.0-82.1
CreatedFeb 25, 2018Jun 14, 2026
GenreActionSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for ABA, 5 for +1 Fat Per Click.

ABA vs +1 Fat Per Click — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals