ABA vs Save Animals!

ABA currently leads with 6,857 concurrent players against 4,492, a 1.5Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Save Animals! at 7,353 concurrent players, versus 6,857. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 12.2M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and Save Animals! is charted above.

ABA
6,857
playing now
6,857 24h peak Β· 1.3B visits
VS
Save Animals! 🐾
4,492
playing now
6,624 24h peak Β· 12.2M visits

Player count history

ABASave Animals!

Head to head

Metric ABA Save Animals!Difference
Playing now6,8574,4922,365 (1.5Γ—)
24h peak6,8576,624233
24h average5,5034,837666
7-day peak6,8577,159302
7-day average5,4925,047445
30-day peak6,8577,159302
All-time peak6,8577,353496
24h changeβ–² 12.6%β–Ό 6.9%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits1.3B12.2M1.3B (107.1Γ—)
Visits (24h)410K638.5K228.6K (1.6Γ—)
Visits (7d)1.5M2.2M728.8K
Favorites1M23.7K976.4K (42.2Γ—)
Rating80.8%94.5%β€”
Global rank (players)#240#369of 4,381
Trending score0.8-15.3β€”
CreatedFeb 25, 2018Jun 29, 2026β€”
GenreActionSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for ABA, 5 for Save Animals!.

ABA vs Save Animals! β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals