ABA vs FNAF: Eternal Nights
ABA currently leads with 6,915 concurrent players against 5,650. On all-time peak the record belongs to ABA at 6,924 concurrent players, versus 5,983. Lifetime, ABA has more visits (1.3B vs 313.3M). Full side-by-side history for ABA and FNAF: Eternal Nights is charted above.
ABA
6,915
playing now
6,924 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
FNAF: Eternal Nights 🍕
5,650
playing now
5,832 24h peak · 313.3M visits
Player count history
ABAFNAF: Eternal Nights
Head to head
| Metric | ABA | FNAF: Eternal Nights | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 6,915 | 5,650 | 1,265 |
| 24h peak | 6,924 | 5,832 | 1,092 |
| 24h average | 5,570 | 4,581 | 989 |
| 7-day peak | 6,924 | 5,983 | 941 |
| 7-day average | 5,504 | 4,390 | 1,114 |
| 30-day peak | 6,924 | 5,983 | 941 |
| All-time peak | 6,924 | 5,983 | 941 |
| 24h change | ▲ 14.0% | ▲ 40.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 313.3M | 992.4M (4.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 424.2K | 535.3K | 111.1K |
| Visits (7d) | 1.5M | 1.9M | 347.8K |
| Favorites | 1M | 837K | 163.1K |
| Rating | 80.8% | 94.4% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #240 | #285 | of 4,381 |
| Trending score | 4.5 | 15.8 | — |
| Created | Feb 25, 2018 | Oct 27, 2022 | — |
| Genre | Action | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for ABA, 5 for FNAF: Eternal Nights.