Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) vs Flex UGC Codes

Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) currently leads with 1,672 concurrent players against 810, a 2.1× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) at 2,314 concurrent players, versus 2,232. Lifetime, Flex UGC Codes has more visits (136.2M vs 89M). Full side-by-side history for Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) and Flex UGC Codes is charted above.

Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6)
1,672
playing now
2,314 24h peak · 89M visits
VS
Flex UGC Codes
810
playing now
1,894 24h peak · 136.2M visits

Player count history

Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6)Flex UGC Codes

Head to head

Metric Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) Flex UGC CodesDifference
Playing now1,672810862 (2.1×)
24h peak2,3141,894420
24h average1,610739871 (2.2×)
7-day peak2,3142,23282
7-day average1,365714651 (1.9×)
30-day peak2,3142,23282
All-time peak2,3142,23282
24h change 8.5% 4.4%
7d change
Total visits89M136.2M47.2M (1.5×)
Visits (24h)94.7K283.3K188.6K (3.0×)
Visits (7d)421.6K1.4M987.5K (3.3×)
Favorites869.8K1.7M868.7K (2.0×)
Rating92.4%84.5%
Global rank (players)#1,112#1,660of 5,275
Trending score56.69.7
CreatedJul 29, 2023Oct 19, 2023
GenreAdventureUtility & Other

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 6 days for Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6), 6 for Flex UGC Codes.

Interliminality (ALPHA 1.3.6) vs Flex UGC Codes — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals