[CYBER] Mining Simulator vs [TESTING] War of the Worlds

[TESTING] War of the Worlds currently leads with 718 concurrent players against 259, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [TESTING] War of the Worlds at 736 concurrent players, versus 419. Lifetime, [CYBER] Mining Simulator has more visits (832M vs 42.2M). Full side-by-side history for [CYBER] Mining Simulator and [TESTING] War of the Worlds is charted above.

[⚡CYBER] Mining Simulator
259
playing now
316 24h peak · 832M visits
VS
[TESTING] War of the Worlds
718
playing now
736 24h peak · 42.2M visits

Player count history

[CYBER] Mining Simulator[TESTING] War of the Worlds

Head to head

Metric [CYBER] Mining Simulator [TESTING] War of the WorldsDifference
Playing now259718459 (2.8×)
24h peak316736420 (2.3×)
24h average260616356 (2.4×)
7-day peak419736317 (1.8×)
7-day average263613350 (2.3×)
30-day peak419736317 (1.8×)
All-time peak419736317 (1.8×)
24h change 2.4% 2.5%
7d change
Total visits832M42.2M789.8M (19.7×)
Visits (24h)16K81.5K65.6K (5.1×)
Visits (7d)71.2K110.1K38.8K (1.5×)
Favorites4.3M316.1K4M (13.7×)
Rating92.8%86.0%
Global rank (players)#2,428#1,648of 4,573
Trending score-2.51.3
CreatedFeb 10, 2018Oct 25, 2024
GenreSimulationAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [CYBER] Mining Simulator, 2 for [TESTING] War of the Worlds.

[CYBER] Mining Simulator vs [TESTING] War of the Worlds — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals