[CYBER] Mining Simulator vs Shazam: Battlegrounds

[CYBER] Mining Simulator currently leads with 180 concurrent players against 120, a 1.5× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [CYBER] Mining Simulator at 419 concurrent players, versus 291. Momentum favours [CYBER] Mining Simulator: -23.1% week over week versus -31.4% for Shazam: Battlegrounds. Lifetime, [CYBER] Mining Simulator has more visits (832.1M vs 17.9M). Full side-by-side history for [CYBER] Mining Simulator and Shazam: Battlegrounds is charted above.

[⚡CYBER] Mining Simulator
180
playing now
281 24h peak · 832.1M visits
VS
Shazam: Battlegrounds
120
playing now
242 24h peak · 17.9M visits

Player count history

[CYBER] Mining SimulatorShazam: Battlegrounds

Head to head

Metric [CYBER] Mining Simulator Shazam: BattlegroundsDifference
Playing now18012060 (1.5×)
24h peak28124239
24h average20314162
7-day peak28124239
7-day average20010793 (1.9×)
30-day peak419242177 (1.7×)
All-time peak419291128
24h change 8.0% 24.8%
7d change 23.1% 31.4%
Total visits832.1M17.9M814.3M (46.6×)
Visits (24h)13.5K27.1K13.7K (2.0×)
Visits (7d)100.6K149.2K48.6K
Favorites4.3M2M2.3M (2.2×)
Rating92.8%87.2%
Global rank (players)#3,111#3,483of 8,283
Trending score3.156.1
CreatedFeb 10, 2018Mar 13, 2025
GenreSimulationAction

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for [CYBER] Mining Simulator, 9 for Shazam: Battlegrounds.