[CYBER] Mining Simulator vs +1 Health Per Click
+1 Health Per Click currently leads with 401 concurrent players against 170, a 2.4× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to +1 Health Per Click at 1,241 concurrent players, versus 419. Momentum favours +1 Health Per Click: +17.2% week over week versus -24.2% for [CYBER] Mining Simulator. Lifetime, [CYBER] Mining Simulator has more visits (832.1M vs 59.2M). Full side-by-side history for [CYBER] Mining Simulator and +1 Health Per Click is charted above.
[⚡CYBER] Mining Simulator
170
playing now
281 24h peak · 832.1M visits
VS
[💖] +1 Health Per Click
401
playing now
738 24h peak · 59.2M visits
Player count history
[CYBER] Mining Simulator+1 Health Per Click
Head to head
| Metric | [CYBER] Mining Simulator | +1 Health Per Click | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 170 | 401 | 231 (2.4×) |
| 24h peak | 281 | 738 | 457 (2.6×) |
| 24h average | 196 | 492 | 296 (2.5×) |
| 7-day peak | 281 | 738 | 457 (2.6×) |
| 7-day average | 197 | 491 | 294 (2.5×) |
| 30-day peak | 419 | 738 | 319 (1.8×) |
| All-time peak | 419 | 1,241 | 822 (3.0×) |
| 24h change | ▲ 4.8% | ▼ 11.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 24.2% | ▲ 17.2% | — |
| Total visits | 832.1M | 59.2M | 772.9M (14.0×) |
| Visits (24h) | 13.4K | 65.4K | 52K (4.9×) |
| Visits (7d) | 100K | 449.8K | 349.8K (4.5×) |
| Favorites | 4.3M | 2.8M | 1.5M (1.5×) |
| Rating | 92.8% | 97.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,911 | #1,996 | of 8,338 |
| Trending score | -1.0 | 0.5 | — |
| Created | Feb 10, 2018 | Feb 19, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Simulation | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for [CYBER] Mining Simulator, 14 for +1 Health Per Click.