[CYBER] Mining Simulator vs Basketball Card Farm

Basketball Card Farm currently leads with 467 concurrent players against 292, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Basketball Card Farm at 493 concurrent players, versus 419. Lifetime, [CYBER] Mining Simulator has more visits (832M vs 333.7K). Full side-by-side history for [CYBER] Mining Simulator and Basketball Card Farm is charted above.

[⚡CYBER] Mining Simulator
292
playing now
316 24h peak · 832M visits
VS
Basketball Card Farm
467
playing now
493 24h peak · 333.7K visits

Player count history

[CYBER] Mining SimulatorBasketball Card Farm

Head to head

Metric [CYBER] Mining Simulator Basketball Card FarmDifference
Playing now292467175 (1.6×)
24h peak316493177 (1.6×)
24h average26435389
7-day peak41949374
7-day average26630741
30-day peak41949374
All-time peak41949374
24h change 20.0% 45.9%
7d change
Total visits832M333.7K831.7M (2493.1×)
Visits (24h)17K23.5K6.5K
Visits (7d)62.4K52.4K10K
Favorites4.3M9434.3M (4581.8×)
Rating92.8%97.7%
Global rank (players)#2,180#1,823of 4,380
Trending score-1.735.5
CreatedFeb 10, 2018Jun 19, 2026
GenreSimulationSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for [CYBER] Mining Simulator, 4 for Basketball Card Farm.

[CYBER] Mining Simulator vs Basketball Card Farm — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals