Blood Zone vs [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG

Blood Zone currently leads with 2,871 concurrent players against 2,667. On all-time peak the record belongs to Blood Zone at 3,311 concurrent players, versus 3,249. Lifetime, Blood Zone has more visits (27.2M vs 24.5M). Full side-by-side history for Blood Zone and [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG is charted above.

Blood Zone 🩸
2,871
playing now
3,311 24h peak Β· 27.2M visits
VS
[πŸ€MAJOR UPD]🎲 EMOTE RNG
2,667
playing now
3,249 24h peak Β· 24.5M visits

Player count history

Blood Zone[MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG

Head to head

Metric Blood Zone [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNGDifference
Playing now2,8712,667204
24h peak3,3113,24962
24h average2,6791,680999 (1.6Γ—)
7-day peak3,3113,24962
7-day average1,820823997 (2.2Γ—)
30-day peak3,3113,24962
All-time peak3,3113,24962
24h changeβ–² 39.0%β–² 194.2%β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits27.2M24.5M2.7M
Visits (24h)173.8K57K116.8K (3.0Γ—)
Visits (7d)588.8K219.2K369.6K (2.7Γ—)
Favorites104.5K37.2K67.2K (2.8Γ—)
Rating79.1%88.2%β€”
Global rank (players)#614#651of 4,743
Trending score159.7326.2β€”
CreatedJul 4, 2023Aug 1, 2025β€”
GenreShooterSimulationβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Blood Zone, 5 for [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG.

Blood Zone vs [MAJOR UPD] EMOTE RNG β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals