Blood Zone [2X] vs [Testing] DMvsS
[Testing] DMvsS currently leads with 4,733 concurrent players against 2,868, a 1.7× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [Testing] DMvsS at 5,712 concurrent players, versus 4,400. Momentum favours Blood Zone [2X]: +62.3% week over week versus -8.2% for [Testing] DMvsS. Lifetime, [Testing] DMvsS has more visits (162.6M vs 29.1M). Full side-by-side history for Blood Zone [2X] and [Testing] DMvsS is charted above.
Blood Zone [💸2X]
2,868
playing now
4,400 24h peak · 29.1M visits
VS
[Testing] DMvsS
4,733
playing now
5,022 24h peak · 162.6M visits
Player count history
Blood Zone [2X][Testing] DMvsS
Head to head
| Metric | Blood Zone [2X] | [Testing] DMvsS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,868 | 4,733 | 1,865 (1.7×) |
| 24h peak | 4,400 | 5,022 | 622 |
| 24h average | 3,248 | 3,912 | 664 |
| 7-day peak | 4,400 | 5,134 | 734 |
| 7-day average | 3,028 | 3,282 | 254 |
| 30-day peak | 4,400 | 5,278 | 878 |
| All-time peak | 4,400 | 5,712 | 1,312 |
| 24h change | ▲ 0.5% | ▲ 14.6% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 62.3% | ▼ 8.2% | — |
| Total visits | 29.1M | 162.6M | 133.5M (5.6×) |
| Visits (24h) | 235.7K | 422.8K | 187.1K (1.8×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.6M | 2.9M | 1.3M (1.8×) |
| Favorites | 109.6K | 3.7M | 3.6M (34.0×) |
| Rating | 79.2% | 81.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #561 | #326 | of 8,283 |
| Trending score | 25.3 | 68.5 | — |
| Created | Jul 4, 2023 | Jan 27, 2025 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for Blood Zone [2X], 13 for [Testing] DMvsS.