Blood Zone vs Catch A Fade 2
Blood Zone currently leads with 2,959 concurrent players against 1,861, a 1.6× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Blood Zone at 3,148 concurrent players, versus 2,912. Lifetime, Blood Zone has more visits (27.2M vs 18M). Full side-by-side history for Blood Zone and Catch A Fade 2 is charted above.
Blood Zone 🩸
2,959
playing now
3,148 24h peak · 27.2M visits
VS
Catch A Fade 2
1,861
playing now
2,912 24h peak · 18M visits
Player count history
Blood ZoneCatch A Fade 2
Head to head
| Metric | Blood Zone | Catch A Fade 2 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 2,959 | 1,861 | 1,098 (1.6×) |
| 24h peak | 3,148 | 2,912 | 236 |
| 24h average | 2,600 | 1,915 | 685 |
| 7-day peak | 3,148 | 2,912 | 236 |
| 7-day average | 1,799 | 1,657 | 142 |
| 30-day peak | 3,148 | 2,912 | 236 |
| All-time peak | 3,148 | 2,912 | 236 |
| 24h change | ▲ 37.3% | ▲ 28.4% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 27.2M | 18M | 9.2M (1.5×) |
| Visits (24h) | 170.8K | 211.2K | 40.4K |
| Visits (7d) | 562.4K | 713.8K | 151.4K |
| Favorites | 104.4K | 30.4K | 74K (3.4×) |
| Rating | 79.1% | 89.3% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #630 | #932 | of 4,743 |
| Trending score | 150.0 | 50.4 | — |
| Created | Jul 4, 2023 | May 20, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Shooter | Action | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Blood Zone, 5 for Catch A Fade 2.