Lumber Tycoon 2 vs Build to Survive [TESTING]

Build to Survive [TESTING] currently leads with 5,027 concurrent players against 1,806, a 2.8× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive [TESTING] at 7,729 concurrent players, versus 2,335. Momentum favours Lumber Tycoon 2: +13.9% week over week versus +13.7% for Build to Survive [TESTING]. Lifetime, Lumber Tycoon 2 has more visits (1.3B vs 268.3M). Full side-by-side history for Lumber Tycoon 2 and Build to Survive [TESTING] is charted above.

🌳 Lumber Tycoon 2
1,806
playing now
2,159 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️ [TESTING]
5,027
playing now
6,297 24h peak · 268.3M visits

Player count history

Lumber Tycoon 2Build to Survive [TESTING]

Head to head

Metric Lumber Tycoon 2 Build to Survive [TESTING]Difference
Playing now1,8065,0273,221 (2.8×)
24h peak2,1596,2974,138 (2.9×)
24h average1,7664,9843,218 (2.8×)
7-day peak2,2867,5575,271 (3.3×)
7-day average1,7255,1713,446 (3.0×)
30-day peak2,2867,5575,271 (3.3×)
All-time peak2,3357,7295,394 (3.3×)
24h change 3.5% 0.8%
7d change 13.9% 13.7%
Total visits1.3B268.3M1B (4.9×)
Visits (24h)112K431.7K319.7K (3.9×)
Visits (7d)827.2K3.3M2.5M (4.0×)
Favorites4.6M5.6M986.3K
Rating87.7%96.5%
Global rank (players)#972#376of 7,866
Trending score7.6-13.3
CreatedJul 30, 2009Aug 12, 2021
GenreSimulationSurvival

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 12 days for Lumber Tycoon 2, 11 for Build to Survive [TESTING].