Lumber Tycoon 2 vs Build to Survive
Build to Survive currently leads with 4,300 concurrent players against 1,302, a 3.3× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Build to Survive at 7,252 concurrent players, versus 2,335. Momentum favours Lumber Tycoon 2: +8.4% week over week versus -6.1% for Build to Survive. Lifetime, Lumber Tycoon 2 has more visits (1.3B vs 409.6M). Full side-by-side history for Lumber Tycoon 2 and Build to Survive is charted above.
🌳 Lumber Tycoon 2
1,302
playing now
2,209 24h peak · 1.3B visits
VS
Build to Survive 🛠️
4,300
playing now
6,972 24h peak · 409.6M visits
Player count history
Lumber Tycoon 2Build to Survive
Head to head
| Metric | Lumber Tycoon 2 | Build to Survive | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 1,302 | 4,300 | 2,998 (3.3×) |
| 24h peak | 2,209 | 6,972 | 4,763 (3.2×) |
| 24h average | 1,642 | 5,297 | 3,655 (3.2×) |
| 7-day peak | 2,214 | 7,086 | 4,872 (3.2×) |
| 7-day average | 1,678 | 4,985 | 3,307 (3.0×) |
| 30-day peak | 2,214 | 7,086 | 4,872 (3.2×) |
| All-time peak | 2,335 | 7,252 | 4,917 (3.1×) |
| 24h change | ▼ 1.2% | ▼ 3.1% | — |
| 7d change | ▲ 8.4% | ▼ 6.1% | — |
| Total visits | 1.3B | 409.6M | 900.5M (3.2×) |
| Visits (24h) | 119.6K | 545.3K | 425.6K (4.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 825.2K | 3.4M | 2.6M (4.2×) |
| Favorites | 4.6M | 10.9M | 6.3M (2.4×) |
| Rating | 87.7% | 96.2% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,081 | #350 | of 8,339 |
| Trending score | -6.8 | 23.2 | — |
| Created | Jul 30, 2009 | Feb 12, 2021 | — |
| Genre | Simulation | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 14 days for Lumber Tycoon 2, 13 for Build to Survive.