The Classic Soccer vs Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]
Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] currently leads with 3,512 concurrent players against 600, a 5.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to The Classic Soccer at 6,670 concurrent players, versus 6,620. Momentum favours Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]: +26.3% week over week versus -19.7% for The Classic Soccer. Lifetime, The Classic Soccer has more visits (100.9M vs 54.4M). Full side-by-side history for The Classic Soccer and Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] is charted above.
The Classic Soccer
600
playing now
5,605 24h peak · 100.9M visits
VS
Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]
3,512
playing now
6,620 24h peak · 54.4M visits
Player count history
The Classic SoccerSurvive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha]
Head to head
| Metric | The Classic Soccer | Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha] | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 600 | 3,512 | 2,912 (5.9×) |
| 24h peak | 5,605 | 6,620 | 1,015 |
| 24h average | 1,991 | 4,621 | 2,630 (2.3×) |
| 7-day peak | 6,623 | 6,620 | 3 |
| 7-day average | 2,695 | 3,793 | 1,098 |
| 30-day peak | 6,670 | 6,620 | 50 |
| All-time peak | 6,670 | 6,620 | 50 |
| 24h change | ▼ 5.2% | ▲ 27.5% | — |
| 7d change | ▼ 19.7% | ▲ 26.3% | — |
| Total visits | 100.9M | 54.4M | 46.4M (1.9×) |
| Visits (24h) | 226.9K | 591.1K | 364.2K (2.6×) |
| Visits (7d) | 1.9M | 3.3M | 1.3M (1.7×) |
| Favorites | 33.8K | 160.9K | 127K (4.8×) |
| Rating | 84.3% | 74.8% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #1,533 | #357 | of 7,213 |
| Trending score | -85.4 | 79.5 | — |
| Created | Jun 5, 2023 | May 30, 2026 | — |
| Genre | Sports & Racing | Survival | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 11 days for The Classic Soccer, 10 for Survive 7 Days In Arctic [Alpha].