FMR vs Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]

FMR currently leads with 1,729 concurrent players against 1,402. On all-time peak the record belongs to FMR at 3,283 concurrent players, versus 2,854. Momentum favours Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]: +168.0% week over week versus +6.3% for FMR. Lifetime, FMR has more visits (353.1M vs 4.6M). Full side-by-side history for FMR and Total Conquest WW2 [Beta] is charted above.

FMR
1,729
playing now
3,087 24h peak · 353.1M visits
VS
[👑] Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]
1,402
playing now
2,635 24h peak · 4.6M visits

Player count history

FMRTotal Conquest WW2 [Beta]

Head to head

Metric FMR Total Conquest WW2 [Beta]Difference
Playing now1,7291,402327
24h peak3,0872,635452
24h average2,1651,892273
7-day peak3,0872,734353
7-day average1,9291,87356
30-day peak3,0872,734353
All-time peak3,2832,854429
24h change 5.4% 17.2%
7d change 6.3% 168.0%
Total visits353.1M4.6M348.6M (77.5×)
Visits (24h)228.8K411.1K182.2K (1.8×)
Visits (7d)1.5M3M1.4M (1.9×)
Favorites1M29K1M (35.6×)
Rating94.9%92.4%
Global rank (players)#796#941of 8,339
Trending score40.33.3
CreatedJan 17, 2018Jul 29, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimStrategy

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 13 days for FMR, 13 for Total Conquest WW2 [Beta].