FMR vs Roll to Defend

FMR currently leads with 1,441 concurrent players against 753, a 1.9× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to FMR at 2,375 concurrent players, versus 1,563. Lifetime, FMR has more visits (351.1M vs 13.6M). Full side-by-side history for FMR and Roll to Defend is charted above.

FMR
1,441
playing now
2,337 24h peak · 351.1M visits
VS
Roll to Defend
753
playing now
1,096 24h peak · 13.6M visits

Player count history

FMRRoll to Defend

Head to head

Metric FMR Roll to DefendDifference
Playing now1,441753688 (1.9×)
24h peak2,3371,0961,241 (2.1×)
24h average1,763893870 (2.0×)
7-day peak2,3751,563812 (1.5×)
7-day average1,6801,159521
30-day peak2,3751,563812 (1.5×)
All-time peak2,3751,563812 (1.5×)
24h change 20.2% 15.0%
7d change
Total visits351.1M13.6M337.5M (25.9×)
Visits (24h)205.8K71.6K134.2K (2.9×)
Visits (7d)519.6K301.4K218.3K (1.7×)
Favorites1M28.9K1M (35.7×)
Rating94.9%95.8%
Global rank (players)#939#1,400of 4,425
Trending score15.8-66.4
CreatedJan 17, 2018May 14, 2026
GenreRoleplay & Avatar SimSimulation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for FMR, 5 for Roll to Defend.

FMR vs Roll to Defend — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals