Lua Learning vs A Jump Per Difficulty

A Jump Per Difficulty currently leads with 8 concurrent players against 2, a 4.0× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to A Jump Per Difficulty at 23 concurrent players, versus 15. Lifetime, Lua Learning has more visits (9.8M vs 2.4M). Full side-by-side history for Lua Learning and A Jump Per Difficulty is charted above.

Lua Learning
2
playing now
15 24h peak · 9.8M visits
VS
A Jump Per Difficulty
8
playing now
23 24h peak · 2.4M visits

Player count history

Lua LearningA Jump Per Difficulty

Head to head

Metric Lua Learning A Jump Per DifficultyDifference
Playing now286 (4.0×)
24h peak15238 (1.5×)
24h average792
7-day peak15238 (1.5×)
7-day average5105 (2.0×)
30-day peak15238 (1.5×)
All-time peak15238 (1.5×)
24h change 16.7% 18.2%
7d change 66.7%
Total visits9.8M2.4M7.3M (4.0×)
Visits (24h)5K1.8K3.2K (2.7×)
Visits (7d)18.6K3.9K14.7K (4.7×)
Favorites305.4K7.2K298.2K (42.4×)
Rating93.5%46.5%
Global rank (players)#5,199#4,969of 7,215
Trending score8.2-3.6
CreatedJan 15, 2018Sep 28, 2020
GenreEducationObby & Platformer

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 10 days for Lua Learning, 3 for A Jump Per Difficulty.

Lua Learning vs A Jump Per Difficulty — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals