Lua Learning vs STAGING

Lua Learning currently leads with 0 concurrent players against 0. On all-time peak the record belongs to Lua Learning at 6 concurrent players, versus 2. Lifetime, Lua Learning has more visits (9.7M vs 8.4K). Full side-by-side history for Lua Learning and STAGING is charted above.

Lua Learning
0
playing now
5 24h peak · 9.7M visits
VS
STAGING
0
playing now
2 24h peak · 8.4K visits

Player count history

Lua LearningSTAGING

Head to head

Metric Lua Learning STAGINGDifference
Playing now00tie
24h peak523 (2.5×)
24h average211 (2.0×)
7-day peak624 (3.0×)
7-day average211 (2.0×)
30-day peak624 (3.0×)
All-time peak624 (3.0×)
24h change 33.3%
7d change
Total visits9.7M8.4K9.7M (1160.9×)
Visits (24h)63967572 (9.5×)
Visits (7d)1.5K761.4K (19.1×)
Favorites305.4K121305.2K (2523.7×)
Rating93.5%82.3%
Global rank (players)#3,993#4,118of 4,380
Trending score0.00.0
CreatedJan 15, 2018Dec 7, 2022
GenreEducation

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 4 days for Lua Learning, 3 for STAGING.

Lua Learning vs STAGING — Player Count Comparison | RoVitals