Try To Die vs [UPD]Football Legends
[UPD]Football Legends currently leads with 1,724 concurrent players against 277, a 6.2× advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to [UPD]Football Legends at 2,161 concurrent players, versus 1,626. Lifetime, [UPD]Football Legends has more visits (127.2M vs 46M). Full side-by-side history for Try To Die and [UPD]Football Legends is charted above.
Try To Die 💀
277
playing now
708 24h peak · 46M visits
VS
[UPD]🏈Football Legends🏈
1,724
playing now
2,161 24h peak · 127.2M visits
Player count history
Try To Die[UPD]Football Legends
Head to head
| Metric | Try To Die | [UPD]Football Legends | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Playing now | 277 | 1,724 | 1,447 (6.2×) |
| 24h peak | 708 | 2,161 | 1,453 (3.1×) |
| 24h average | 487 | 1,426 | 939 (2.9×) |
| 7-day peak | 1,626 | 2,161 | 535 |
| 7-day average | 958 | 1,230 | 272 |
| 30-day peak | 1,626 | 2,161 | 535 |
| All-time peak | 1,626 | 2,161 | 535 |
| 24h change | ▼ 45.0% | ▲ 109.1% | — |
| 7d change | — | — | — |
| Total visits | 46M | 127.2M | 81.2M (2.8×) |
| Visits (24h) | 51.3K | 72.3K | 21K |
| Visits (7d) | 244.3K | 250.1K | 5.8K |
| Favorites | 2.3M | 89.8K | 2.2M (25.3×) |
| Rating | 82.4% | 86.5% | — |
| Global rank (players) | #2,195 | #876 | of 4,380 |
| Trending score | -129.2 | 49.3 | — |
| Created | Apr 13, 2023 | Sep 2, 2024 | — |
| Genre | Puzzle | Sports & Racing | — |
Other comparisons
Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history — 5 days for Try To Die, 5 for [UPD]Football Legends.