Try To Die vs Viral Emotes Testing

Viral Emotes Testing currently leads with 2,204 concurrent players against 600, a 3.7Γ— advantage. On all-time peak the record belongs to Viral Emotes Testing at 2,252 concurrent players, versus 1,626. Lifetime, Try To Die has more visits (46M vs 1.5M). Full side-by-side history for Try To Die and Viral Emotes Testing is charted above.

Try To Die πŸ’€
600
playing now
708 24h peak Β· 46M visits
VS
Viral Emotes Testing
2,204
playing now
2,252 24h peak Β· 1.5M visits

Player count history

Try To DieViral Emotes Testing

Head to head

Metric Try To Die Viral Emotes TestingDifference
Playing now6002,2041,604 (3.7Γ—)
24h peak7082,2521,544 (3.2Γ—)
24h average5131,8491,336 (3.6Γ—)
7-day peak1,6262,252626
7-day average9411,849908 (2.0Γ—)
30-day peak1,6262,252626
All-time peak1,6262,252626
24h changeβ–Ό 15.8%β€”β€”
7d changeβ€”β€”β€”
Total visits46M1.5M44.5M (29.8Γ—)
Visits (24h)44.7K91.5K46.8K (2.0Γ—)
Visits (7d)267.2K91.5K175.7K (2.9Γ—)
Favorites2.3M4.4K2.3M (515.4Γ—)
Rating82.4%74.1%β€”
Global rank (players)#1,819#856of 4,575
Trending score-120.50.0β€”
CreatedApr 13, 2023Jul 1, 2026β€”
GenrePuzzleSocialβ€”

Other comparisons

Both games are sampled on the same schedule and plotted on a shared time axis, so the comparison is like for like. Peaks, averages and growth come from RoVitals's own recorded history β€” 5 days for Try To Die, 1 for Viral Emotes Testing.

Try To Die vs Viral Emotes Testing β€” Player Count Comparison | RoVitals